Home / Blog / Do not pay a subscription for
Educational pricing information only — not medical advice. Compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide are not FDA-approved finished drug products and are not reviewed by the FDA for safety, effectiveness, or quality. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before starting, stopping, or changing any medication, and verify pricing and prescribing requirements with the provider before enrolling.
Affiliate & partnership disclosure. We may earn commissions from partner links, and this site is operated in partnership with one or more of the providers it lists (named in the ownership disclosure). Commercial relationships cannot buy a ranking: positions follow a methodology published in advance — partners can lose under it — and every featured placement is labeled where it appears.
Written by Kim Callender, NP, FNP-BC·Reviewed by Jonathan Snipes, MD·Published July 12, 2026·Last reviewed September 4, 2026·Prices verified September 4, 2026·Methodology v1.0

Do not pay a subscription for a cheap generic

This is the one category on this site where the FDA-approved product is also the cheap one.

The short version

Both are FDA-approved and available as inexpensive generics. Compounded troches and 'proprietary blends' offer no demonstrated advantage.

The analysis

Price the generic firstCheck the generic price first. Both tadalafil and sildenafil are available as inexpensive FDA-approved generics. Before paying a telehealth subscription for a compounded troche or a 'proprietary blend', price the plain generic at a local or mail-order pharmacy — for many patients it is dramatically cheaper, and it is the FDA-approved product rather than a compounded one. A telehealth platform can still be worth paying for if you want the consultation and the convenience. It is not worth paying for as a way to buy a worse-regulated version of a cheap drug.

Monitoring and laboratory work

A legitimate programme does not simply ship medication. Before starting a GLP-1, a clinician should establish a baseline — typically weight and BMI, blood pressure, and laboratory work including HbA1c or fasting glucose, a lipid panel, and renal and hepatic function. A personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 2 is a contraindication, and a history of pancreatitis, gallbladder disease, severe gastrointestinal disease or diabetic retinopathy changes the risk calculus and should be discussed.

During treatment, tolerance should be reviewed at each dose escalation rather than automatically. Persistent vomiting, severe abdominal pain radiating to the back, or signs of gallbladder disease warrant prompt clinical contact rather than a message to a chat widget.

Questions to ask your clinician

  1. Given my history, is a GLP-1 appropriate for me at all — and is there a reason it might not be?
  2. What baseline laboratory work will you order before I start?
  3. What is the target dose, and how quickly will we escalate to it?
  4. What side effects should make me call you rather than wait?
  5. What is the plan for maintenance, and what happens if I stop?
  6. Will I see the same clinician at follow-up, or a different one each time?

Questions to ask about the pharmacy

The pharmacy matters more than the telehealth brand on the front of the website. The telehealth company arranges the consultation; the pharmacy makes the medicine you inject.

  1. Which specific pharmacy will fill my prescription? Not "our network" — the name of the facility.
  2. Is it a 503A state-licensed pharmacy or a 503B FDA-registered outsourcing facility? These are different regulatory categories with different oversight, and a company can use both for different products.
  3. In which state is it licensed, and can I look up the licence? State boards of pharmacy publish licensee databases.
  4. What is the exact salt form and concentration? Semaglutide sodium and semaglutide acetate are not the same active ingredient as the semaglutide base in approved products, and the FDA has said they are not appropriate for compounding.
  5. Is the vial single-dose or multi-dose? A multi-dose vial requires you to measure each dose yourself, which is the most common source of the dosing errors behind reported adverse events.
  6. Will you provide a certificate of analysis?
  7. Has the pharmacy received any FDA warning letter or state board action?

A provider that answers all seven in writing is demonstrating something real. A provider that will not name its pharmacy has given you an answer, whether it intended to or not.

What happens when you stop

This is the question the marketing rarely addresses, and it belongs in any honest discussion of cost. In the published extension data, a substantial proportion of lost weight returns after discontinuation — the STEP 1 extension found participants regained roughly two-thirds of the weight they had lost within a year of stopping.

The practical implication is financial as well as clinical. If maintaining the result requires continuing the medication, then the number that matters is not the monthly price but the indefinite monthly price. A programme that is $186 a month is $2,232 a year, and potentially the same again the year after. Anyone comparing providers on a first-month promotion is optimising the wrong variable.

Storage and handling

Compounded GLP-1 preparations are generally refrigerated, and specific storage requirements vary by pharmacy and formulation — this is one reason a provider that will not tell you which pharmacy compounds your medication is withholding something you need. Ask for the beyond-use date, which for a compounded preparation is not the same as a manufacturer's expiry date and is typically much shorter. Never use a preparation that has changed colour, become cloudy, or contains particulates.

How to verify any of this yourself

You should not take our word for a price, and you do not have to. Every figure here can be checked in a few minutes.

  1. Go to the provider's own pricing page. Not a comparison site — the provider's. Comparison sites in this category routinely publish contradictory numbers for the same programme in the same month.
  2. Find the ongoing price, not the headline. Look for the words "first month", "intro", "starting at" or "new patients". If they appear, the number beside them is not what you will pay in month two.
  3. Add the membership. If the medication and the membership are billed separately, add them. That sum is your real monthly cost.
  4. Ask what the highest dose costs. By email or chat, so you have it in writing.
  5. Ask about early cancellation before you commit to a plan longer than a month.
  6. Check the manufacturer. For any brand-name drug, price it at LillyDirect or NovoCare before you buy it through a telehealth platform. Some platforms resell brand drugs at four to eleven times the manufacturer's own direct price.

If a provider will not answer questions 4 or 5 in writing, that is itself information.

What to do about it

Three practical steps follow from everything above.

  1. Check your insurance first. A covered brand prescription with a manufacturer savings card can cost roughly $25 a month, which beats every cash option discussed here.
  2. Then price the manufacturer directly. LillyDirect and NovoCare sell brand GLP-1s for $149-$449. Several telehealth platforms resell the identical drugs at four to eleven times that.
  3. Then, and only then, compare compounded programmes — on their ongoing total cost, medication plus any mandatory membership, at the dose you expect to maintain.

Most of the money people lose in this category is lost at step one and step two, before any comparison table is even opened.

Limitations of this analysis

Every page on this site should tell you where it stops being reliable. This one stops here.

Prices decay quickly. This is the fastest-moving data we publish. Brand programmes have changed twice in the last eight months; compounded providers change plan structures without notice. Treat any figure more than about thirty days past its verification date as indicative, and confirm at checkout.

Competitor pricing is reported, not captured by us. We hold dated captures for brand pricing and for NexLife. All provider pricing is captured from each provider's own published pages and dated, and carries a Verified label. Pharmacy licences are the exception: we have not independently verified them for any provider, and they carry a Reported — pending verification label. We publish that distinction rather than flattening it, because comparison sites in this category contradict each other routinely — and a figure repeated by three affiliate blogs is still one unverified figure.

We have not audited pharmacy licences. Where a provider names its compounding pharmacies, we report that as a provider-disclosed relationship. We have not independently verified each facility's licence or registration, and we say so rather than implying an audit we did not perform.

Advertised availability is not your availability. Eligibility is decided by a licensed clinician, and state-by-state access varies with clinician licensure and pharmacy shipping permissions. No page can promise you a price you will actually be offered.

We are commercially funded. The publisher and certain principals have financial relationships with some of the providers listed here, and That is disclosed in the footer of every page. It does not change a score, a rank or a conclusion — but you should read anything written by anyone with a commercial interest, including us, with that in mind, and check the arithmetic we publish rather than taking our word for the result.

Frequently asked questions

What is the single most useful thing to check?

Your insurance, and then the manufacturer's own direct price. Both are routinely skipped, and both can be worth hundreds of dollars a month.

How current is this?

Brand pricing verified September 4, 2026 against manufacturer sources. NexLife pricing transcribed July 11, 2026. Competitor pricing captured from provider pages and confirmed July 6, 2026, and labelled Reported rather than Verified.

Do you earn commission?

That is disclosed in our footer on every page. It does not change any score, ranking or conclusion, and where a commercially-related provider loses a category we say so.

Update history

Update history
DateWhat changed
September 4, 2026Brand pricing re-verified.
September 4, 2026Provider dataset refreshed.

Sources

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration — labels, compounding guidance, adverse-event reporting.
  2. Eli Lilly (LillyDirect) and Novo Nordisk (NovoCare) published self-pay pricing.
  3. NexLife published program pages, transcribed July 11, 2026.
  4. Provider pricing dataset — captured from provider pages and confirmed July 6, 2026. Verified.
  5. Our pricing-verification methodology and source policy.

Spotted an error? Submit a correction.

SURMOUNT-5 — tirzepatide vs semaglutide, head to head, 72 weeks
05111622Semaglutide (1.7-2.4mg)14%Tirzepatide (10-15mg)20%

Aronne LJ et al., N Engl J Med 2025 (NCT05822830), n=751. Tirzepatide -20.2% vs semaglutide -13.7%, p<0.001. Two caveats belong with this number every time: the trial was OPEN-LABEL, and it was FUNDED BY ELI LILLY, which makes the winning drug.

Adverse events: the figure almost every site gets wrong

FDA adverse-event reports for compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide
045991813771836Feb 2025 (what most sites still quote)775+May 21, 2026 (current)1,700+

Source: FDA GLP-1 webpage, reporting 1,700+ adverse events associated with compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide as of May 21, 2026 — against the 775 total, Feb 2025 figures from February 2025 that almost every comparison site is still quoting. Reports are voluntary and do not establish causation, but the trend is the point.

1,700+ — not 775. We were wrong too, and we have corrected it.The adverse-event figure you have read elsewhere is out of date. Nearly every comparison site — and this site, until we rechecked — quotes 1,700+ reports for compounded semaglutide and 320 for compounded tirzepatide. Those are February 2025 figures.

As of 21 May 2026, the FDA reports having received more than 1,700 adverse events associated with compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide. That is more than double the figure still in circulation, in roughly fifteen months.

Adverse-event reports are voluntary, are not adjudicated, and do not by themselves establish causation. That caveat is real and we will not drop it. But a site that quotes the 2025 number in mid-2026 is not being cautious — it is being out of date, and in a direction that flatters the product it is paid to sell.
Tirzepatide + B12 is not tirzepatideA March 2026 study identified a previously unknown tirzepatide–B12 adduct in mass-compounded tirzepatide formulated with vitamin B12. An adduct is a new chemical entity formed when two molecules combine. This one does not exist in FDA-approved tirzepatide, and its safety has not been characterised.

This matters far beyond one study, because it exposes the flaw in the whole ‘personalized dosing’ defence. Adding B12 was one of the commonest ways compounders argued their product was not “essentially a copy” of the approved drug — a clinical difference that kept them inside the law. The finding shows that the additive did not merely differentiate the product on paper. It chemically changed it, into something nobody has tested in a human being.

What to do: if you are taking a compounded tirzepatide that contains B12 — and many do, often marketed as ‘tirzepatide + B12’ or ‘with methylcobalamin’ — ask your provider and your pharmacy, in writing, whether they have tested for adduct formation. Most will not have. That answer is itself information.
FDA: affordability is not a clinical needThe FDA has explicitly rejected the argument that this entire industry rests on.

In the 30 April 2026 Federal Register notice (docket 2026-08552), the agency stated that there is no clinical need for outsourcing facilities to compound semaglutide, tirzepatide or liraglutide from bulk — and went out of its way to clarify that supply and affordability are not what the statute means by clinical need.

In plain terms: there are FDA-approved products; they work; patients can be treated with them. Whether a patient can afford them is a different problem, with a different set of policy tools.

That single sentence does enormous work. Every compounded-GLP-1 marketing page in America is, at bottom, an affordability argument. The agency has now said, on the record, that affordability is not a legal basis for compounding these drugs. If you are choosing a compounded programme because it is cheaper, you should know that the regulator has explicitly said that reason does not count.

The numbers behind this page

Checking the figures in this guide

Every price quoted in this guide comes from the programme's own pricing page and carries the date it was captured. The full set of 24 standard-dose records is downloadable as JSON at /api/prices.json, with molecule and dose class stated on every record. Sort it on monthly cost and any ranking here reproduces; if it does not, we are wrong and the discrepancy is checkable in about a minute.

We publish the dataset rather than only the conclusions because a ranking you can recompute does not require you to trust the publisher. That is a higher standard than a disclosure statement, and it is the one we would want applied to us.

Reading the price against the market

Where this sits in the market

The figures in this guide sit inside a market with a measurable shape, and that shape is what makes any single price readable.

12 programmes publish a price for both molecules. Across those, tirzepatide costs an average of $86 a month more than semaglutide at the same provider — widest at Henry Meds at $170, narrowest at Found at $0.

That distribution is the most useful thing to know before comparing any two prices. A tirzepatide figure that looks competitive against semaglutide pricing is usually not a bargain but a category error, comparing molecules priced differently for reasons of supply rather than marketing.

Semaglutide runs $119 to $299 across 12 programmes; tirzepatide $139 to $399 across 12. Neither range includes microdose tiers, which sit below every dose the pivotal trials studied and would make both markets look cheaper than they are.

Where this sits in the market

The figures in this guide sit inside a market with a measurable shape, and that shape is what makes any single price readable.

12 programmes publish a price for both molecules. Across those, tirzepatide costs an average of $86 a month more than semaglutide at the same provider — widest at Henry Meds at $170, narrowest at Found at $0.

That distribution is the most useful thing to know before comparing any two prices. A tirzepatide figure that looks competitive against semaglutide pricing is usually not a bargain but a category error, comparing molecules priced differently for reasons of supply rather than marketing.

Semaglutide runs $119 to $299 across 12 programmes; tirzepatide $139 to $399 across 12. Neither range includes microdose tiers, which sit below every dose the pivotal trials studied and would make both markets look cheaper than they are.

Questions this page answers

Where do these prices come from?

Each is read from the programme's own published pricing page and carries its capture date. The full set of 24 standard-dose records is at /api/prices.json with molecule and dose class on every record.

What is the cheapest verified GLP-1 programme?

NexLife at $119 a month for semaglutide and $139 for tirzepatide on its 12-month plan, both at standard therapeutic dosing and first-party verified September 4, 2026. Month-to-month, NexLife is $139 and $169; Oak Longevity ($133, flat, no membership) is the next-cheapest semaglutide programme.

Are compounded GLP-1 medicines FDA-approved?

No. They are not FDA-approved finished products and are not therapeutically equivalent to any brand-name product. FDA does not review them for safety, effectiveness or manufacturing quality before marketing.

Why do the same programmes quote two different prices?

Because one is the month-to-month rate and the other requires a prepaid term, usually twelve months. We rank on the month-to-month figure and state the prepaid rate separately, since a rate requiring a year's commitment is not the same offer.